About Magazine Podcasts Events
Museum Hours:Wednesday–Saturday, 10AM–5PM

Digital Collections

Business correspondence

Letter from Dr. Alex Muckle to James Curtis Booth, June 4, 1858

  • 1858-Jun-04

Rights

Public Domain

Download all 3 images

PDFZIPof full-sized JPGs

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1855px — 456 KBFull-sized JPG2310 x 3571px — 1.3 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 2310 x 3571px — 23.7 MB
View
Public
Domain
PDF
Download PDF
ZIP
of full-sized JPGs
Download ZIP

A. Muckle, a former pupil of James Curtis Booth (1810-1888), writes from Germany comparing the chemists Robert Wilhelm Eberhard Bunsen (1811-1899) and Friedrich Wöhler (1800-1882) and inquiring as to his prospects upon returning to the United States.

Property Value
Author
Addressee
Place of creation
Format
Genre
Extent
  • 21.5 cm W x 27.8 cm H
Language
Subject
Rights Public Domain Mark 1.0
Credit line
  • Courtesy of Science History Institute

Institutional location

Department
Collection
Series arrangement
  • Series I: Correspondence 1824-1888
Physical container
  • Box 1, Folder 7

View collection guide View in library catalog

Learn More

Scientific Biography
Justus von Liebig and Friedrich Wöhler

Related Items

Cite as

Muckle, Alex. “Letter from Dr. Alex Muckle to James Curtis Booth, June 4, 1858,” June 4, 1858. Papers of James Curtis Booth, Box 1, Folder 7. Science History Institute. Philadelphia. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/gmvwq9o.

  Export citation (RIS) ?

This citation is automatically generated and may contain errors.

Rights

Public Domain

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 960px — 259 KBLarge JPG2880 x 2305px — 1.2 MBFull-sized JPG4494 x 3597px — 2.6 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 4494 x 3597px — 46.3 MB

Rights

Public Domain

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1845px — 321 KBFull-sized JPG2323 x 3571px — 1.0 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 2323 x 3571px — 23.8 MB

The Science History Institute recognizes there are materials in our collections that may be offensive or harmful, containing racist, sexist, Eurocentric, ableist, or homophobic language or depictions. The history of science is not exempt from beliefs or practices harmful to traditionally marginalized groups. The Institute is engaged in ongoing efforts to responsibly present and address the evidence of oppression and injustice inextricable from the history of science. If you would like to learn more about our ongoing efforts or if you encounter harmful, inaccurate, or insufficient descriptions, please contact us at digital@sciencehistory.org.