About Magazine Podcasts Events
Museum Hours:Wednesday–Saturday, 10AM–5PM

Digital Collections

Business correspondence

Letter from Conrad William Faber to James Curtis Booth, September 8, 1852

  • 1852-Sep-08

Rights

Public Domain

Download all 2 images

PDFZIPof full-sized JPGs

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1490px — 325 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3575px — 1.4 MBFull-sized JPG3662 x 4546px — 2.1 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 3662 x 4546px — 47.7 MB
View
Public
Domain
PDF
Download PDF
ZIP
of full-sized JPGs
Download ZIP

Written to James Curtis Booth (1810-1888) from his brother-in-law, Conrad W. Faber concerning charges leveled against Booth by Richard Sears McCulloh (1818 – 1894). Booth allegedly left 5% silver content in with refined gold, 4/5 of which should have been separated out by the Refining Department.

Property Value
Addressee
Author
Place of creation
Format
Genre
Extent
  • 22.5 cm W x 27.9 cm H
Language
Subject
Rights Public Domain Mark 1.0
Credit line
  • Courtesy of Science History Institute
Digitization funder
  • Newman Numismatic Portal at Washington University in St. Louis.

Institutional location

Department
Collection
Series arrangement
  • Series I: Correspondence 1824-1888
Physical container
  • Box 1, Folder 6

View collection guide View in library catalog

Related Items

Cite as

Faber, Conrad William. “Letter from Conrad William Faber to James Curtis Booth, September 8, 1852,” September 8, 1852. Papers of James Curtis Booth, Box 1, Folder 6. Science History Institute. Philadelphia. https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/xhw0h5h.

  Export citation (RIS) ?

This citation is automatically generated and may contain errors.

Rights

Public Domain

Download selected image

Small JPG1200 x 1479px — 171 KBLarge JPG2880 x 3550px — 1017 KBFull-sized JPG3688 x 4546px — 1.6 MBOriginal fileTIFF — 3688 x 4546px — 48.0 MB

The Science History Institute recognizes there are materials in our collections that may be offensive or harmful, containing racist, sexist, Eurocentric, ableist, or homophobic language or depictions. The history of science is not exempt from beliefs or practices harmful to traditionally marginalized groups. The Institute is engaged in ongoing efforts to responsibly present and address the evidence of oppression and injustice inextricable from the history of science. If you would like to learn more about our ongoing efforts or if you encounter harmful, inaccurate, or insufficient descriptions, please contact us at digital@sciencehistory.org.